In addition, under such circumstances, FC Shirak was obviously the beneficiary of the actions of his or her employee and consequently the responsible person. ” The Disciplinary Committee also invited Ararat Harutyunyan to the session, who did not attend the session, but presented his position on the issue by phone, which was also recorded (attached) by his knowledge. The latter, in particular, said that his conversations with the footballer was due to the future possible transfer of footballer and his previous bonuses and that he did not give any money to the player to influence the outcome of the game. Ararat Harutyunyan, in general, tried to present the reality in such a way that the offer to influence the game result was not the player’s own, and he himself did not refuse to try to use the occasion, perhaps he was guilty. Ararat Harutyunyan gave various questions, arguments to the Disciplinary Committee members and cited his own talk with the player, in general, incomplete, illogical, unconvincing, and incompatible answers.